Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Savar's avatar

I hear a version of this question on the court all the time, usually right after someone forgets the score for the third time in a game. Half the time it's nothing, they're just focused on the ball. But I've had a couple of players over the years where I could tell something had actually shifted, not just a bad day.

What I notice with the students I've had for years is that pickleball itself becomes a decent early warning system. Reading the court, tracking score and rotation, reacting to a fast exchange at the net, all of that leans on the same sharpness this study is measuring. When a longtime 3.5 player suddenly can't keep up with things they used to do without thinking, that's usually the first place it shows up before anyone brings up memory testing at all.

Do you think people are more likely to actually stick with something like this if it's tied to an activity they're already doing daily, or does the standalone tracking work just as well on its own?

Cynthia Marinakos's avatar

Hey that sounds like a worthwhile study, interesting to track memory over time. How did you come across this one Paul? :) Love the reminder about data privacy and spotting fake sites. It's so needed.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?